With the recent spate of revelations about the scope of the US government’s intelligence gathering activities many thoughts have been expressed with most centering on either the legality, the security or the leaker.
One thing that occurred to me that has not gotten as much media coverage has to do with the damage to the reputations and futures of those major companies identified as having an NSA vacuum stuck up their butts.
Sure the government can indemnify them from legal actions but can it protect them from consumer backlash?
Case in point: Microsoft, reported as the first one ‘signed on’ to PRISM.
The first leaked item was the VERIZON news that mentioned that the NSA was gathering only Metadata about phone calls and not the calls’ contents.
Since the wiretapping laws refer to telephone conversations and not internet ones that policy ‘obeys the law’.
Now consider Microsoft, the owner of Skype.
IF you’re not a US citizen but you are a Skype user you can be confident in feeling that the NSA has a copy of ALL of your Skype conversations.
Then there’s the latest product from Microsoft, the XBOX One.
It has a Kinect camera built in.
And this version wants to be on and watching All The Time.
- ‘Automatically sign in when you enter the room‘ – meaning it finds and detects faces.
- ‘navigate through your favorite TV shows with the sound of your voice‘ – meaning it listens and pays attention to what’s being said.
- ‘Advanced noise isolation lets Kinect know who to listen to, even in a crowded room‘ – particular attention
- ‘An all-new active IR camera enables it to see in the dark‘ – no hiding without covering the camera.
I have heard it can watch and track 5 or 6 people in the room simultaneously … Oh, and it wants to online and connected all the time.
So if you are NOT a US citizen living within the USA you can never be sure what the US Intelligence services are gathering about you and your friends or what they think.
Many people say if you’re not a bad person you have nothing to hide so why worry?
Leaving that argument aside I would suggest that if you’re a company that depends on the trust and goodwill of customers to buy your stuff then the recent revelations should give YOU cause to worry.
To Microsoft I’d say:
I wonder how this will affect your sales outside the USA?
You’ve already caused controversy with your used game policies and now you’ve been exposed as a conduit for the secret police of the US government.
In many countries around the world they don’t like secret police … the very concept scares them. And even those who aren’t bad guys would have to get used to the feeling that their living rooms are no longer quite theirs anymore. Perhaps that will be enough to cause them to spend their money on your competitors systems because these kinds of purchasing decisions are heavily affected by ‘gut feelings’.
Aside from the XBOX and gamers, what about corporate customers?
IF you’re a legal firm representing anyone or any company that has a beef with the US government, the security establishment OR a major competitor to some US company that is deemed ‘too big to fail’ and considered critical to US national economic interests … how are you going to feel about using Skype? Using Microsoft Office in the Cloud?
To those that label this as paranoia I’d suggest you research the reasons for the fall of the Allende government of Chile in the 1970s and pay close attention to what is said about ITT and the desire of the government to nationalize the telephone system. Many say that is the reason for the coup … US history has many stories about military action taken on behalf of American Corporate interests. Many might be familiar with the phrase ‘Gunboat Diplomacy‘ … there is another phrase that owes its origin to the American version called ‘Big Stick Diplomacy‘. That is shown, for example, in the behavior of the US government with respect to dealing with ‘threats’ by local, national, governments to US fruit companies operating in Central America.
And after the Wall fell and the Soviet Union collapsed the CIA redefined its role and for a while they were selling their declassified take and analysis to Corporations – US ones of course. National health follows from Economic health; can it be that hard to see some making the leap to national interests follow from corporate interests?
So what’s a big corporation to do once it’s been exposed as being a shill and conduit for the secret police?
Time will tell …